<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Yahoo and Bing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webranking.com/blog/google-yahoo-and-bing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webranking.com/blog/google-yahoo-and-bing</link>
	<description>News, Advice &#38; Tips on SEO, SEM, SMO, PPC, Links &#38; Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.webranking.com/blog/google-yahoo-and-bing/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webranking.com/blog/?p=83#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Danielle, at the heart of it, the Bing engine is indeed utilizing the same algorithm that was used for the Live.com engine.  However, they now make search for videos, shopping, news, maps and travel a little more intuitive, and the search results feature additional bells and whistles that provide the searcher with targeted information and suggestions relating to their search query.

I&#039;ve been of the opinion that Live&#039;s algorithm wasn&#039;t bad to begin with and tended to provide relevant results.  With the new features, and of course the 85 to 100 million advertising budget, Bing is becoming more of a relevant search options in the minds of the searching public.  The early statistics have already shown that Bing has jumped ahead of Yahoo as the second most utilized engine.  Now it will be up to them to continue to refine their algorithm and search options in order to maintain that growth and secure more searchers from Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle, at the heart of it, the Bing engine is indeed utilizing the same algorithm that was used for the Live.com engine.  However, they now make search for videos, shopping, news, maps and travel a little more intuitive, and the search results feature additional bells and whistles that provide the searcher with targeted information and suggestions relating to their search query.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been of the opinion that Live&#8217;s algorithm wasn&#8217;t bad to begin with and tended to provide relevant results.  With the new features, and of course the 85 to 100 million advertising budget, Bing is becoming more of a relevant search options in the minds of the searching public.  The early statistics have already shown that Bing has jumped ahead of Yahoo as the second most utilized engine.  Now it will be up to them to continue to refine their algorithm and search options in order to maintain that growth and secure more searchers from Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.webranking.com/blog/google-yahoo-and-bing/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webranking.com/blog/?p=83#comment-35</guid>
		<description>You know, I was really sort of interested when I heard about Bing. But from what I can tell, the search functions really haven&#039;t improved. It&#039;s like Microsoft simply changed the colors, upped the marketing, and relaunched the same product. I was not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I was really sort of interested when I heard about Bing. But from what I can tell, the search functions really haven&#8217;t improved. It&#8217;s like Microsoft simply changed the colors, upped the marketing, and relaunched the same product. I was not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

